Case Study: Identify Differentially Expressed genes (DEGs) in Ovarian Cancer Patients

The goal of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ovarian cancer patients compared to healthy individuals and to explore the potential biological functions and pathways involved in ovarian cancer progression.

Background:

Gene expression analysis is a powerful tool that can provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer progression.

Problem Statement:

A team of researchers was interested in studying the genomes of a specific type of bacteria that is known to cause food poisoning in humans. They collected genome sequencing data from several strains of the bacteria and wanted to analyze the data to identify any genetic factors that may contribute to the bacteria's virulence.

The first step in their analysis was to assemble the genome sequences. Genome assembly involves piecing together the small fragments of DNA that are generated during sequencing into a complete genome. The researchers used specialized software to perform the assembly and generated high-quality genomes for each of the bacterial strains.

Next, the researchers used a variety of data analytics techniques to compare the genomes of the different strains. They identified genetic variations that were unique to the virulent strains of the bacteria and used statistical analysis to determine if these variations were significant. They also looked for patterns in the data that could help explain why some strains of the bacteria are more virulent than others.

One interesting finding was that the virulent strains of the bacteria had a unique set of genes that were not present in the non-virulent strains. These genes were related to the production of toxins that are known to cause food poisoning in humans. The researchers hypothesized that these genes may be responsible for the increased virulence of the bacteria. To further test their hypothesis, the researchers used machine learning algorithms to predict the virulence of new strains of the bacteria based on their genome sequences. They trained the algorithms on the genome sequences of the previously studied strains and used the resulting models to predict the virulence of new strains that had not yet been tested in the lab. The models were able to accurately predict the virulence of these new strains based solely on their genome sequences.

Data:

The dataset used in this study was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The dataset contained gene expression data from 50 ovarian cancer patients and 50 healthy individuals. The goal of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ovarian cancer patients compared to healthy individuals and to explore the potential biological functions and pathways involved in ovarian cancer progression.

Methodology:

The gene expression data was preprocessed and normalized using the R programming language. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 package. The DEGs were identified using a threshold of log2 fold change > 2 and an adjusted p-value < 0.05. The DEGs were further analyzed using gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis.

Results:

The analysis identified a total of 987 DEGs in ovarian cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. The top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes are shown in the table.

Below table Top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes in ovarian cancer patients compared to healthy individuals.

Result Analysis:

GO analysis revealed that the upregulated genes were mainly involved in cell proliferation, cell adhesion, and response to cytokine signaling, while the downregulated genes were involved in extracellular matrix organization, lipid metabolism, and response to oxidative stress. Pathway analysis showed that the upregulated genes were enriched in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, while the downregulated genes were enriched in the PPAR signaling pathway.

To further validate the DEGs identified in this study, we performed hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) on the gene expression data. The clustering analysis showed a clear separation between ovarian cancer patients and healthy individuals, indicating that the DEGs were able to discriminate between the two groups. The PCA analysis showed that the first two principal components explained a significant proportion of the variance in the data, and the ovarian cancer patients were clearly separated from healthy individuals in the PCA plot.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates the power of data analytics in identifying dysregulated gene expression in ovarian cancer patients. The analysis identified several DEGs that were involved in ovarian cancer progression and provided insights into the biological processes and pathways that were affected by these DEGs. This information can be used to develop targeted therapies for ovarian cancer patients and to identify biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to explore the potential clinical applications of this approach.

Have a question ?

Are you looking to create a lasting impact with your data analytics? Contact us to create them in hours.